Planned switch from GCSEs to Baccalaureate in England 'abandoned'
Plans to scrap GCSEs in key subjects in England and replace them with English Baccalaureate Certificates are being abandoned by the government.
The reversal was announced by the education secretary in the Commons, alongside curriculum changes.
Michael Gove said plans for the new exams had been "a bridge too far".
In 1961 President John F Kennedy had a dream: A Nation of free-thinking, rational people, capable of critical thinking & holding an administration accountable for their errors. We follow this belief. We've decided to make part of our ethos: Self-Governance & Responsibility of the People; backing the ideal of Liberty & a Global Community of Constitutional Republics.
Showing posts with label cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cuts. Show all posts
Friday, February 08, 2013
(Brit) SocialMedia: 'U-turn' over scrapping of GCSEs
Sunday, November 04, 2012
Labour Calls for £7.20 an Hour 'Living Wage'
Reblogged from The Writing's on the Wall: i-Politics:
Ed and David Miliband have put their political rivalry aside to work on plans for millions of workers to be paid a “living wage” of at least £7.20 an hour - Read More @ Telegraph »
Ed and David Miliband have put their political rivalry aside to work on plans for millions of workers to be paid a “living wage” of at least £7.20 an hour - Read More @ Telegraph »
Friday, November 02, 2012
i-thorts' i-Politics: Welfare Cuts? - Not In Our Back Yard!
BBC reported (Child benefit 'nimbys' accused) that Middle-classes are fuming at the thought of losing some (or all) child-benefit one parent is earning from £50,000 to £60,000 and over. (Families of three children could loose £4,000.)
This comes after poorer couples (working under 24 hour a week between them) lost up to £100 week (£5,200 a year) in working tax from this April ... and no one battered an eye or even seemed to report it. These are families on minimum wage, earning under £6,000.
Labels:
BBC News,
blog,
British,
Child benefit,
Coalition,
cuts,
David Gauke,
HM Treasury,
Member of Parliament,
Minimum wage,
MP,
NIMBY,
Political party,
Tory,
unemployed,
Welfare State
Location:
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
Sunday, September 02, 2012
The Curious Thing About A Coalition
reblogged from i-thorts' i-Politics
Cameron is said to be reshuffling his cabinet early this month (September). The move is in the hope of rekindle his party's low spirits and appeasing the right. It's hoped that fresh faces will revive Tory standing in the poles.
The call for William Hague to replace George Osborne as Chancellor of the Exchequer is a tacktick to appear like a softening of the current hardline policy concerning welfare cuts. However, will this will be enough, with Britain in the current double-dip resession and our shocking ecconomic performance of late?
Rumours has it, that all the all the 'big guns' will be staying but there are to be promotions also.
He has a juggling act to perform: He needs to keep the grassroots Conservatives happy, while appealing to the voting public. To do this he has to keep on with his policies to keep the right incheck and also seem to be for the people. Something the even a master of spin, like him, will find difficult.
Having said that, it's a curious fact that in reality, as part of a coalition government, the Tories have to appoint Lib Dems to posts (a certain fixed number), so Cameron can't do much at all. That means that he has to keep them happy too...
How David Cameron is to achieve all this and keep everyone happy is total speculation so far. But we don't have to wait too long.
COALITION CABINET
RESHUFFLE
RESHUFFLE
Cameron is said to be reshuffling his cabinet early this month (September). The move is in the hope of rekindle his party's low spirits and appeasing the right. It's hoped that fresh faces will revive Tory standing in the poles.
Twitter September 02, 2012 at 02:27PM
- @YouGov: Update - Labour lead on 6: Latest Sunday Times results 31st Aug-2nd Sep - CON 35%, LAB 41%, LD 9%, UKIP 7%; APP -36
The call for William Hague to replace George Osborne as Chancellor of the Exchequer is a tacktick to appear like a softening of the current hardline policy concerning welfare cuts. However, will this will be enough, with Britain in the current double-dip resession and our shocking ecconomic performance of late?
Rumours has it, that all the all the 'big guns' will be staying but there are to be promotions also.
He has a juggling act to perform: He needs to keep the grassroots Conservatives happy, while appealing to the voting public. To do this he has to keep on with his policies to keep the right incheck and also seem to be for the people. Something the even a master of spin, like him, will find difficult.
Having said that, it's a curious fact that in reality, as part of a coalition government, the Tories have to appoint Lib Dems to posts (a certain fixed number), so Cameron can't do much at all. That means that he has to keep them happy too...
How David Cameron is to achieve all this and keep everyone happy is total speculation so far. But we don't have to wait too long.
Labels:
blog,
Coalition,
cuts,
David Cameron,
Economics,
George Osborne,
Government,
Lib Dems,
Politics,
Tories,
Twitter,
Welfare State
Location:
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Lib Dems Tax Unearned Wealth
reblogged from i-thorts' i-Politics
Wealth TaxNick Clegg was revising an 'old Liberal' idea when he put forth Liberal Demercrat's intentions to tax the wealthy: by rewarding 'hard work' but levying unearend wealth.
This bombshell of the Deputy PM's temporary wealth tax has shook Westminster; upsetting both Tories and Labour MPs into from their summer hiatus. Both parties have poured critisism on Mr Glegg's plans for a "time limited contribution" from society's rich.
Differences?
Mid-way through the coalition's parliment, and as all political parties gear up for the 2015 general election, Nick Clegg's trying desperately to distance Lib Dems from their Tory coalition partners. Clegg wants his party to "start spreading ... wings more ... unencumbered and unrestrained by coalition."
Further cuts
Chancellor, George Osborne, is planning to target the poor with an extra £10bn in welfare cuts (to come into inergration 2016) which were introduced in the budget. Mr Clegg -although he accepts some cuts to welfare- would rather target the top echelon "than starts at the bottom."
However, it seem unlikely that the Chanellor will be swayed by Mr Clegg's proposal.
LIB DEMs TAX
Unearned
Wealth
Unearned
Wealth
Wealth TaxNick Clegg was revising an 'old Liberal' idea when he put forth Liberal Demercrat's intentions to tax the wealthy: by rewarding 'hard work' but levying unearend wealth.
This bombshell of the Deputy PM's temporary wealth tax has shook Westminster; upsetting both Tories and Labour MPs into from their summer hiatus. Both parties have poured critisism on Mr Glegg's plans for a "time limited contribution" from society's rich.
Liberals have for decades believed in focusing tax on wealth. In his interview he spoke of "an old Liberal idea that you should be rewarding initiative and hard work but you should be making people who have unearned wealth make a contribution".
- Nick Clegg puts space between Lib Dems and Tories with tax bombshell - Guardian Politics 29/08/12
Differences?
Mid-way through the coalition's parliment, and as all political parties gear up for the 2015 general election, Nick Clegg's trying desperately to distance Lib Dems from their Tory coalition partners. Clegg wants his party to "start spreading ... wings more ... unencumbered and unrestrained by coalition."
Further cuts
Chancellor, George Osborne, is planning to target the poor with an extra £10bn in welfare cuts (to come into inergration 2016) which were introduced in the budget. Mr Clegg -although he accepts some cuts to welfare- would rather target the top echelon "than starts at the bottom."
However, it seem unlikely that the Chanellor will be swayed by Mr Clegg's proposal.
.: George Osborne's reply to Clegg's proposal? :.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

